- Undeveloped rebrands to DAN.com, uses blockchain for transfers
- Auction front running pops up in cybersquatting dispute
- Q & A with MicroStrategy, which just sold Voice.com for $30 million
- New features? I just want domain platforms to work.
- Record breaker: Voice.com domain name sells for staggering $30 million
News
Undeveloped rebrands to DAN.com, uses blockchain for transfers
Company leverages blockchain technology to speed domain purchases and transfers.
DAN bot is part of DAN.com’s blockchain-based domain transfer and escrow system.
Domain name sales platform Undeveloped has rebranded as DAN.com and introduced a new blockchain-based domain transfer system.
The new transfer system is aided by DAN bot, which is short for Domain Transfer Assistant. The conversation-based transfer concierge manages the escrow based on where the domain is registered and the unique characteristics of that registrar:
The moment you purchase a domain, the DAN bot knows exactly at which registrar the domain is registered, if the domain is locked and which transfer options are available per registrar.
We have designed DAN in such a way that DAN even knows what the good and less well-designed processes of the managing registrar are.
By doing this, you, the buyer will always receive transfer instructions that are tailored for your transaction which saves a lot of time and frustration. Anyone without any domain expertise can now benefit from a painless, smooth and swift transaction.
According to DAN.com, unlocked domains can be transferred in 5-15 minutes, or instantaneously if they are in the DAN network.
DAN.com worked with IBM to build its blockchain. Anyone can see the blockchain and view recent transactions and sales at explorer.dan.com.
The company says its new platform will enable faster transfers and better liquidity. It will open it to other people who want to build a service and tap into its transfer and escrow services.
It should also make domain leasing and fractional domain ownership easier. DAN.com has plans for fractional ownership that it will release later this year.
The company bought the Dan.com domain name last year for $190,000.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Auction front running pops up in cybersquatting dispute
Front running makes for a confusing cybersquatting case.
Auction front running is black mark on the domain name market.
Front runners email potential buyers of a domain name before winning a domain name auction, usually as a domain name expires. If they find an eager prospect for the domain, they bid up the price of the domain to win it and sell it to the buyer.
The practice is highlighted in a recent UDRP, Stonz Wear Inc. v. Domain Admin, Level2 LLC.
Stonz Wear was bombarded with offers to buy the domain Stonz.com before the domain was auctioned on NameJet. The company engaged with some of the inquirers, including one “Dan Wilson”, who worked for the Respondent.
The Respondent, which won the auction, explained to Stonz Wear that the inquiries it received (other than from Dan Wilson) were from front runners. It called the practice nefarious and said it doesn’t condone it.
But Stonz Wear pointed out that, based on the auction timeline, Level 2 LLC was one of the front runners itself! Dan Wilson reached out prior to the end of the auction.
The World Intellectual Property Organization panel found in favor of Stonz Wear and ordered the domain transferred.
Stonz Wear lost a prior UDRP it filed on this name against a previous owner.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Q & A with MicroStrategy, which just sold Voice.com for $30 million
Company answers questions about its domain name portfolio.
MicroStrategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) announced yesterday that it sold the domain name Voice.com for $30 million in cash, shattering the previous record for a public all-cash domain transaction. I reached out to a company spokesperson with a few questions. Although the company was rather careful with its answers, I’m sure domain investors will like the company’s view on domains. The company also said it’s interested in equity deals.
DNW: $30 million is a record-breaking amount for a publicly announced domain sale. How did you arrive at this number? How long did you work on this deal?
MicroStrategy: In our opinion, previous domain name sales by others may have undervalued domain names. We can’t go into specifics about the negotiations surrounding the sale of the Voice.com domain name other than to say that we are pleased with the outcome.
DNW: You have some great first names such as Mike.com, Arthur.com and Frank.com. What’s the story behind why the company registered these domains?
MicroStrategy: We hold various domain names that have been used or are contemplated to be used by our business. We believe domain names like Mike.com, Arthur.com, and Frank.com are evocative and powerful, and can provide unique and significant value to a business.
Editor’s note: the company’s founder and CEO is Michael Saylor. The company owns both Mike.com and Michael.com. I suspect many of the first names were those of people connected to the company in the early days.
DNW: Should companies only contact you about your domains if they are willing to spend at least 7 figures? Or would you be open to deals below that amount?
MicroStrategy: We value each of our domain names based upon a number of factors, including the domain name’s potential uses and the value it would bring to a particular strategic transaction. We believe these domain names are launching pads and critical assets for billion dollar brands. Companies that have grand aspirations should contact us.
DNW: Is MicroStrategy only interested in all-cash deals?
MicroStrategy: We are open to opportunities with parties who can leverage these ultra-premium domain names for maximum market impact. We are particularly interested in opportunities involving equity or other strategic arrangements.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
New features? I just want domain platforms to work.
Some domain platforms have major flaws that should be fixed quickly.
I’ve read a few posts from domainers recently who want domain service providers to add new features. I want new features, too, but at a minimum, I just want the services to work. Few things are more frustrating than when services don’t work as they are intended.
Here are a few examples of services not working correctly that have caused me to pull out my hair.
NameJet – When you buy a domain name, you expect it to show up in your account. It might take a few days, and even longer when it’s a private party transaction. Things can happen that delay this but I expect NameJet to be on top of it. Earlier this year, I had to follow up to get a domain in my account. It took multiple support requests to get a response. If I hadn’t noticed this domain wasn’t added to my account, it probably wouldn’t have happened. I would have paid for the domain but never received it. This erodes trust.
Oh, and NameJet’s app alerts (still) don’t work. I don’t understand how a company can leave so much money on the table by not fixing this. Heck, redo the entire app if needed.
Enom – I’ll give Tucows a bit of a pass because I know it’s replacing the Enom system with a new backend. In the meantime, ever try to get authorization codes? Some arrive within minutes. Others arrive within weeks. Re-requesting them speeds it up sometimes, but I have serious questions about the stability of this platform.
GoDaddy – When you spend time adding domains for sale, the last thing you want is an error message that forces you to start over. I haven’t seen this error message in a while, but it sure is/was frustrating. Even for a beta, this should have been fixed earlier. I also have numerous domains that appear to be stuck in some sort of Afternic purgatory and can’t be added.
So while I understand calls for new features, I hope platforms prioritize fixing bugs and creating systems to verify the integrity of their platforms.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Record breaker: Voice.com domain name sells for staggering $30 million
Microstrategy cashes in on one of its premium domain names, sets a high water mark.
MicroStrategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) sold the domain name Voice.com for $30 million, the company announced today.
This is a record–by a large margin–for a public domain-only sale.
Blockchain-based social media platform Block.one bought the domain name in an all-cash deal facilitated by GoDaddy. It actually paid more than $30 million when you consider its undisclosed commission to GoDaddy.
Microstrategy, an enterprise analytics and software company, owns a nice catalog of valuable domain names that it hasn’t put to use, including Alert.com, Courage.com, Mike.com and Usher.com.
The company has fended off attempts to steal its domains through cybersquatting claims, including Glory.com an Emma.com.
A list of some of its best domain names is at Strategy.com.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Missed connections: another smart domain sales idea
A great idea to close deals at previously negotiated prices.
I like it when domain name companies try new and interesting things. They don’t always work, but this industry needs more creative thinking.
The latest comes from Uniregistry. The company took some of its uncompleted sales and is offering them to the public (with permission of the seller).
The list includes domains in which the buyer and seller agreed to a price but the buyer never paid. Each domain is listed with the final agreed price.
If a buyer wants one of the domains, they should open a new inquiry at the accepted price to purchase the domain.
Uniregistry VP of Sales Jeffrey Gabriel notes that “This is not a starting point, and there will not be negotiations.”
From a buyer perspective, I like how you get to skip the negotiations and get domains at fair prices. No wasted time.
Before posting this story, I secured one of the domains on the list: SodaFountain.com. I like this name as a brandable similar to my name CandyCorn.com.
Here are some of the domains:
- SodaFountain.com (sorry, too late)
- BenefitsCard.com $4,000
- Specifications.com $8,000
- Bootstrappers.com $5,000
- Chapter11.com $25,000
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Proactive domain sales with Joe Uddeme – DNW Podcast #240
Learn about changes to the domain market and how to sell your domains proactively.
Want to learn a process for figuring out end user buyers for your domain names? On today’s show, Joe Uddeme of Name Experts LLC walks us through how he does outbound lead qualifying and marketing. He also gives his take on what’s happened in the domain market since he was last on the podcast in 2014, including the impact of changing habits and new TLDs on “exact match” domains.
Also: About those subpoenas, Uniregistry’s big numbers, DigitalTown’s domain exit, and NamesCon Austin details.
This week’s sponsor: DNAcademy. Use code DNW to save $50.
Subscribe via Apple Podcasts to listen to the Domain Name Wire podcast on your iPhone or iPad, view on Google Play Music, or click play above or download to begin listening. (Listen to previous podcasts here.)
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Clinton Sparks wins domain name back
Grammy-nominated Clinton Sparks gets domain name back after it expired.
Clinton Sparks? Not really. Just an attempt to game the search engines.
DJ, producer and songwriter Clinton Sparks has won the rights to the domain name ClintonSparks.com, which expired after a dispute with his agent.
Sparks and his Get Familiar Music Company registered the domain in 2002 and the agent let it lapse in 2017.
A Ukranian SEO expert then registered the domain name and put up a fake profile of a University of Pennslyvania professor (see image). The profile picture is actually of an American University professor.
The fake profile on ClintonSparks.com links to two sites: UPENN.edu and an academic essay writing service. It seems that the domain owner registered this domain based on its SEO value, and then used the fake site to bolster its backlink profile. The site was designed to confuse search engines.
With the help of attorney John Berryhill, Sparks and Get Familiar Music filed a UDRP with National Arbitration Forum. Berryhill rarely represents Complainants, but he chooses interesting cases when he does.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Clothing company fails to upgrade domain name through UDRP
Clothing company goes after shorter domain name through UDRP.
This clothing company tried to upgrade its domain from LittleJonesiesCo.com to LittleJonesies.com through UDRP. It failed.
A kids and women’s clothing company has lost a cybersquatting dispute against the domain LittleJonesies.com, which is owned by someone with the last name Jones.
The Complainant, Little Jonesies LLC, uses the domain name LittleJonesiesCo.com.
David Jones of Idaho registered the domain in January 2016.
Little Jonesies LLC filed trademarks for the term in 2017 but claimed first use in commerce of 2015.
Interestingly, the company didn’t register its own domain name until April 2016, after LittleJonesies.com was registered. It might have just been using third-party ecommece platforms like Etsy without its own domain name.
In its complaint, the clothing seller didn’t address the fact that the registrant’s last name is Jones, which is a decent tip-off that it might have rights or legitimate interests in the domain.
Jones didn’t make a formal reply in the case but said he registered the domain with plans to start a business. He could have just as easily said he registered it because he has kids and it would suffice as a legitimate interest.
The Complainant also failed to provide any evidence that the domain was used in bad faith. It resolved to an error page at the time the complaint was filed.
Panelist David H. Bernstein did not consider reverse domain name hijacking. Thorpe North & Western LLP represented the Complainant.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
DigitalTown let its domain names expire
Company drops new top level domains as it becomes a shell company.
DigitalTown, Inc. filed its delayed 10-K yesterday. It covers the fiscal year ending February 28, 2019.
The annual report discloses that the Company is no longer acquiring or renewing its domain name portfolio. It had $0 in renewal fees during the fiscal year, so many of these domains have already expired. At one point, it had 13,000 .city domain names.
DigitalTown also appears to have wound down most of its “Domain Marketing Development Obligations” in which new top level domain registries paid DigitalTown to register their domain names.
The company has sold off all of its revenue-generating assets and is effectively a shell company. It owes lots of money to creditors, which it hopes to pay off with nearly worthless stock. Shares (OTC: DGTW) last traded yesterday at $.0006. (Hey, it was up 50% on the day!)
Many of the acquisitions the company made in recent years were paid with stock. Assuming the owners didn’t liquidate this stock earlier, they have been wiped out.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Sports equipment company guilty of reverse domain name hijacking
Panel finds Singapore company brought case in abuse of UDRP.
A World Intellectual Property Organization panel has found Sport and Fashion, Pte. Ltd., a sports equipment/apparel company, guilty of reverse domain name hijacking.
The company filed a cybersquatting complaint against the domain demix.com. It markets a brand called Demix.
Canadian company St. Lawrence Cement Inc owns the domain name. It markets cement products under the Demix brand.
The cement company registered the domain in 1998, well before the Complainant had any trademark rights to the term.
Based on the panel decision, it appears the Complainant might have copied-and-pasted information from another UDRP filing into this one:
The Complaint appears to have been prepared with very little attention to detail and as noted above includes erroneous references to a completely unrelated trademark. Once the intended respondent was identified as being a Canadian company likely to be involved in the cement business (given its name), it ought to have been obvious to the Complainant that the Respondent was likely to have independently coined the Disputed Domain Name. If the Complainant was in any way unclear on this issue, a few minutes Internet searching would have found the Respondent’s present web sites at for example “www.demixbeton.ca”. Similarly a search of the Canadian Trademarks Registry would have found a number of DEMIX-related trademarks predating the Complainant’s trademark – whilst these are in various corporate names this should nevertheless have alerted the Complainant to the potential difficulties with its case.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
NamesCon picks The Capital Factory for 2020 show in Austin
Event chooses startup accelerator for its 2020 U.S. event.
The Capital Factory in Austin, Texas.
NamesCon has finalized the date and location details for its 2020 conference.
The event will take place January 26-29 in Austin, TX. Much of the action will take place at The Capital Factory, a business accelerator.
The Capital Factory is in a unique building that is half business offices and half hotel — The Omni. I suspect that The Omni will be the key hotel for guests.
It’s not a big space for a conference, so keynotes, partner workshops and the live domain auction will take place outside Capital Factory, perhaps in the Omni. It could also take place at the office of some of the companies that are just a few blocks away, such as GoDaddy and WPEngine.
Hosting the exhibit hall and various workshops in the incubator presents an interesting opportunity. Exhibitors and the domain industry want to reach end users, and Capital Factory is full of startups. That means exhibitors and speakers can reach a new audience in addition to domain investors.
NamesCon is calling the event “The Domain Economic Forum,” a nod to trying to pull in sponsors and guests that do more than service domain names. It wants companies that are tangentially related, too.
Early bird tickets are available for $349.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Scratch.org update and subpoenas
Here’s why domain investors got subpoena notices from Enom.
There’s been a lot of talk in domain circles today about subpoena notices for domains at Enom.
The subpoena stems from a lawsuit that Scratch Foundation, a non-profit created at MIT, filed against the domain name Scratch.org.
Scratch Foundation filed the case as in rem (meaning against the domain), but Ravi Lahoti stepped forward as the owner. Lahoti says he’s owned the domain name since 1998. DomainTools historical Whois records seem to corroborate his story, at least until Scratch Foundation was formed, although the domain has bounced around different entities/privacy services.
This brings us to the subpoena, which you can view here (pdf). Attorney David Weslow, who is representing Scratch Foundation, asked Enom for a list of Lahoti’s domains. The original subpoena was quite a bit broader than that, but these things are often narrowed between the lawyer and recipient. Regardless, Enom has apparently notified anyone who owns a domain that was at any point tied to Lahoti.
It seems that Weslow is trying to paint Lahoti as a serial cybersquatter.
Indeed, in a recent order (pdf), the judge wrote “Plaintiff has also brought various other anticybersquatting cases against Mr. Lahoti to the Court’s attention which demonstrate that Mr.
Lahoti is a notorious cybersquatter.”
Whether or not Lahoti is a notorious cybersquatter shouldn’t matter on the claim under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act so long as Lahoti proves that he owned the domain before Scratch Foundation had rights in the mark. This seems like it will be easy to do.
But there’s an interesting wrinkle in the lawsuit: it also claims trademark infringement. Should Scratch Foundation show that prior ads on Scratch.org infringed on its trademarks, could it win a judgment against the domain? I’m not familiar with how a judgment for trademark infringement works in an in rem case. But it’s clear that the trademark infringement claim is part of the effort to get control of the domain.
There’s a lesson here involving in rem lawsuits. Lahoti asked the court to name Lahoti as the defendant instead of in rem. This might make it easier to defend but also opens him up to personal liability. The court denied this request on the basis that Lahoti didn’t object early enough to in rem jurisdiction.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
17 end user domain name sales up to €50,000
A vegan hair care line, two soccer-related businesses and a French travel site bought domain names this week.
Creatio.com led Sedo’s weekly public sales list. The domain is still in escrow but this is undoubtedly an end user at this price.
Here’s the list of end user domain name sales that just completed at Sedo. You can view previous lists like this here.
Creatio.com €50,000 – The domain is still in escrow but this is an end user price. There’s a non-profit at Creatio.org, but this is also a good name for a creative service. Creatio.io is also in use.
ShortSelling.com €10,000 – Techbull Media in Spain. I can’t find out much about this company online, but I found one LinkedIn profile showing someone as “head of content” at the company. A reasonable price for this domain.
Koeln.business EUR 6,000 – KoelnBusiness Wirtschaftsfoerderungs-GmbH seems to be like a chamber of commerce for Cologne.
Gazal.com $6,000 – Forwards to Gazzall.com, a women’s apparel and accessories ecommerce site based in Los Angeles.
123seo.com $5,000 – This alphanumeric name was purchased by 123 Marketing, a Canadian website design and SEO company.
HelloWellness.com $5,000 – A health and wellness site. It looks like it’s an upgrade from SayHelloWellness.com
OTPro.com $5,000 – This domain forwars to OneTrust.com, a GDPR and Privacy Management software provider.
Indometal.com $4,950 – Indometal (London) Limited, a subsisidary of PT TIMAH Tbk a State-owned Enterprise, a miner, smelter and exporter of tin from Indonesia.
FanReisen.com €3,500 – RES Touristik GmbH, a tour operator in Europe that books trips to soccer games.
RPB.fr €3,500 – Rapid Pare-Brise. It forwards the domain to its much longer site RapidpareBrise-Nancy.fr This domain is certainly an upgrade for this small French franchise of auto window repair/replacement shops.
RestaurantGift.com $3,500 – Hotelgift provides gift cards that can be used at over 100,000 hotels. I suspect RestaurantGift will be the same thing for restaurants.
Echtgeld-Casino.com €3,400 – German site about casinos, gaming and gambling including news and online casino listings.
SoccerSmart.com £3,000 – An international soccer recruiting company that helps people get soccer scholarships or placed on teams.
VideoMark.net $2,800 – Site offering the “latest news and tutorials about creating live action and motion graphics content.”
Mermaid.me $2,500 – Mermaid + Me is a German all natural vegan hair care line. It forwards this domain to its website MermaidMe.de
PDF24.de €2,000 – Forwards to pdf24.org, a free multilingual service to convert documents into PDF formats.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
The Chronicle of Higher Education defends LinguaFranca.com domain
Man files cybersquatting complaint in an effort to revive Lingua Franca brand.
A blast from the past for academics.
The Chronicle of Higher Education, a publication covering academia, has successfully defended the domain name LinguaFranca.com in cybersquatting dispute.
Lingua Franca was a competitor that went bankrupt. In 2002, The Chronicle for Higher Education acquired rights to Lingua Franca and its trademark through the bankruptcy court. Since then, it has forwarded the domain to its website.
Enter John Summers, a man who wants to relaunch the publication. He obtained a U.S. trademark registration for the term and wants the domain name.
He tried to buy the domain from The Chronicle for $100 but was rebuffed. So he filed a cybersquatting complaint under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).
Summers apparently didn’t hire a lawyer to file the case, and it shows. Any good cybersquatting lawyer would have told him that he didn’t have a case. It’s clear that The Chronicle originally acquired the domain name in good faith. UDRP requires that the Complainant show that it was registered and used in bad faith.
William R. Towns, a UDRP panelist for World Intellectual Property Organization, dutifully found in The Chronicle’s favor.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Gail.com, the Gmail “typo”
This domain name gets a ton of misdirected email.
Yesterday, I wrote about the traffic and purchase inquiries that MarTech.com gets.
It reminded me of another domain name that gets a lot of traffic and offers to purchase: Gail.com.
That’s just one letter off from Gmail.com.
And, according to the owners, it gets a ton of traffic and misdirected emails.
In 2015 it received an average of 5,000 visits a day. More sensational is that it gets 1.2 million misdirected emails per week.
(I emailed the owners about a month ago for updated numbers but did not hear back.)
The owners fought off a UDRP brought by a Brazilian company in 2006.
According to an FAQ on the site, the owners aren’t interested in selling the domain or monetizing it. They could make a lot of money monetizing it with an email data firm!
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
The hilarious “GFY” message at MarTech.com
The owners of MarTech.com put up with lots of purchase inquiries and misdirected email.
Definitely not for sale.
Earlier today I wrote about how Third Door Media is suing rival ClickZ over its use of the term MarTech.
A Domain Name Wire reader pointed out that neither company owns MarTech.com. Indeed, it appears that the company that owns the MarTech.com gets a lot of inquiries about buying the domain. Its website states:
No, this domain name is not for sale. We get this query several times each week, which is why we created this landing page. We registered the domain martech.com in 1993, when you had probably never heard of the Internet, and have operated continuously using this domain name ever since. In case you still do not understand, this domain is not abandoned! We also have no interest in buying your domain name.
It also gets a lot of misdirected email:
MarTech, in one form or another, seems to be a popular domain name and we get lots of email that isn’t intended for us. In the past we’ve been kind enough to reply to misaddressed emails, explaining the error to the sender. After a sufficient number of really nasty responses, we no longer provide that service. There is clearly no remedy for stupidity, and we delete several hundred misdirected emails every week.
If you need a good laugh this Monday morning, the site has more to make you smile.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
No related posts.
Categories: Domains
Uniregistry releases domain data: $50 million sales last year
Domain marketplace releases a treasure trove of data from the past three years.
Sales are heading in the right direction.
Domain name marketplace Uniregistry has released detailed data on its domain name sales between 2016-2018.
The company brokered 5,445 domains for a total of $50.1 million last year, up from $38.9 million in 2017. (The 2018 number is below what Uniregistry VP of Sales Jeff Gabriel expected going into the fourth quarter of last year.)
To sell 5,445 domains, the company made 383,104 phone calls and sent nearly 22 million emails. That’s an average of 70 calls and 4,000 emails per domain sold!
Uniregistry’s biggest sale in 2018 was a two-word domain that sold for over $1 million. 58 domains sold for at least $100,000. One of those was a .net and another was a .co.uk. The others were .com.
The median sales price for 2018 was $3,500. This is higher than other marketplaces such as GoDaddy/Afternic and Sedo, likely because Uniregistry focuses on brokered transactions and doesn’t have a syndicated buy-now listing platform.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
Third Door Media sues ClickZ over MarTech name
Online marketing publisher sues a competitor over use of “MarTech.”
Third Door Media says ClickZ’s use of Mar Tech infringes its trademark. This photo is from ClickZ’s website and was included in a lawsuit over the matter.
Third Door Media, the publisher of Search Engine Land and producer of marketing conferences such as SMX, has sued rival publisher ClickZ for trademark infringement. ClickZ is part of the same company that owns Search Engine Watch.
The dispute stems from the use of “MarTech.” Third Door has a website called MarTech Today and produces a conference called MarTech. It also has a trademark on the term.
In the lawsuit (pdf), Third Door alleges that ClickZ produced an event in March called Marketing Technology Awards. At the event, it shortened the name to Mar Tech. (The photo above, from the ClickZ website and included as an exhibit in the lawsuit, shows the use of Mar Tech at the event).
I imagine that MarTech is a difficult trademark to defend, given that AdTech is a popular term for online advertising technology. Third Door says that it has already convinced AdAge and other companies to cease using the mark.
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
May’s top stories: Intuit, Uber and RDNH
Here’s a look back at the stories that got the most pageviews on Domain Name Wire last month, as well as links to listen to the podcasts.
1. F**K Intuit, says Intuit – It’s been a difficult few months for Intuit (NASDAQ: INTU), maker of TurboTax. It has been criticized for lobbying the U.S. government to prevent the IRS from making it easier to calculate and file taxes online, and then using robots.txt to block information about its free version from search engines. What’s a company to do? Stock up on domains that could be used to criticize it.
2. Uber.com domain could have been $532 million – Universal Music sold the Uber.com (NYSE: UBER) domain name for equity. Had it held onto it until the IPO it would have been worth over a half billion dollars. Instead…
3. Don’t give your web developer access to your domain registrar account – Just don’t. Even one of the comments from a web developer on this story reiterates the point.
4. Missouri dentist tries to reverse hijack domain name – A WIPO panel didn’t approve of this dentist’s actions.
5. Sun Valley ski resort loses silly cybersquatting dispute – Companies need to be smarter when choosing domains to go after.
6. Google launches Safe.page to improve web security smarts – It also released survey data showing that web users have a long way to go before becoming security-literate.
Podcasts
- A Viral Onion Story with Peter Askew – Listen
- Ron Jackson – Listen
- Building Great.com with Erik Bergman – Listen
- Domain investing with Logan Flatt – Listen
© DomainNameWire.com 2019. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact copyright (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Categories: Domains
